Sunday, February 21, 2010

Rashad Gray, Attorney at law6

Issue/Conclusion Standard Facts Reasons
(Common Knowledge, Policy)
Paul met the element of intent because he had to be substantially certain that he would hit someone

when he went skateboarding on a busy side walk. Conclusion not Analytical
Paul met the element of intent because he had to be substantially certain that he would hit someone because it is common knowledge that it is difficult to maneuver around people on a skateboard. Thus, the likelihood of hitting someone while skateboarding increases as there are more pedestrians around.

Conclusion not Analytical
Paul met the element of intent when he went skateboarding on a busy sidewalk because it is common knowledge that it is difficult to maneuver around people on a skateboard. Thus, the likelihood of hitting someone while skateboarding increases as there are more pedestrians around.

Conclusion not Analytical
Paul met the element of intent when he went skateboarding on a busy sidewalk.

Conclusion not Analytical
Paul had to be substantially certain that he would hit someone when he went skateboarding on a busy sidewalk. because it is common knowledge that it is difficult to maneuver around people on a skateboard. Thus, the likelihood of hitting someone while skateboarding increases as there are more pedestrians around.

Acceptable analytical sentence
Paul met the element of intent because he had to be substantially certain that he would hit someone when he went skateboarding on a busy side walk because it is common knowledge that it is difficult to maneuver around people on a skateboard. Thus, the likelihood of hitting someone while skateboarding increases as the number of pedestrians increases. Acceptable Analytical Sentence

No comments:

Post a Comment